Page 5 - IFLS.IDEAS56

Basic HTML Version

4 I The Best Online Education System in the world
CRITICIZING THE CRITIC—ENTERTAINMENT PLUS
Kathlyn Q. Barrozo
Class of 1991, University of Santo Tomas
B.S. Medical Technology
Before attempting to watch a movie or read a book, I prefer to get my fill of critical reviews of those opuses
first. I tend to believe that those who have seen a movie or read a book before me have a heavier authority to
judge that work as superior or inferior. Unfortunately, mixed reviews abound, and one can be hard put to figure
out which is genuinely helpful and which isn’t. And then there’s the star system, where a five-star rating (or
three, depending on the rating agency’s standards) means the work is excellent and anything lower diminishes
its quality. I dread ratings that are a cross between poor and above average (read: average). They make you
choose between having to experience the work yourself and suffering through the consequences of going
through boredom and downright disgust, or the satisfaction of knowing you picked right.
I use ratings as guides, often. But if much hype has been built around the specific movie or book, I strive to find
a way to experience it myself. Some say that later on in life, we always regret more the things we didn’t do than
the things we did. The what ifs tend to set us back more notches than the why dids, so many of us push
everything to the edge. When the condemnations come, such people have a simplistic and non-complex
justification of everything: you never learn your lessons first because they always come later.
This reminds me of a very young star’s really trying and difficult experience last year. The star has disappeared
from the entertainment scene after that much-talked about occurrence, all the better to recuperate from all
the pain and bitterness it has caused. The star acknowledged the mistakes made, but refused to admit that
those mistakes were half as serious as the other person’s as it had been that young star’s. Well, perhaps the
young star was just trying to salvage whatever could be salvaged. Who knows, with the way this country’s
citizens easily forget even earth-shaking events, the young star’s travails could very well be forgotten (and
forgiven) in a few years or so.
Critics from both sides have most likely not forgotten (and forgiven) everything and everybody yet. And who
can blame them? They might have heaped praise on one side while spouting vitriol on the other. That’s a
natural phenomenon in such situations. The spectators among us can only look and listen and do no more.
Adding our own criticism can only muddle up the situation and create unrest. It’d be as senseless and stupid as
poking a hornet’s nest. You never get anything good from that.
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION:
1.
Talk about a certain entertainment industry occurrence that has been heavily criticized in your
country.
2.
Is there any showbiz personality you admire for living an exemplary life, without cause for criticism?
Talk about this star.
3.
Why is it often helpful to read critical reviews?
4.
Pick a movie to watch. Deliver a sensible critique of the movie in class.
5.
What makes you choose to watch a movie or read a book? Is it easy to tell the difference between a
good and a lousy movie or book? How do you personally tell the difference?